Opinion

What Our Legal Aid Work Actually Looks Like

We provide legal assistance to journalists, bloggers, human rights defenders and protesters prosecuted over what they publish or where they stand. These are the cases behind that offer.

What Our Legal Aid Work Actually Looks Like
#EndBadGovernance protest. Photo: Amnesty International.

Access to justice is easy to state as a principle and expensive to deliver as a service. Someone arrested for a story they published, or for where they chose to stand on a particular afternoon, does not need a statement of principle. They need a lawyer that week, and most of them cannot pay for one. Closing that gap is what our legal aid work exists to do.

Who we act for

We provide legal assistance to journalists, bloggers, human rights defenders, protesters and other individuals facing unlawful arrest, detention, harassment or prosecution arising from the exercise of their fundamental rights and their digital civic engagement.

That is a narrower promise than it sounds. It is not general legal aid. It is aid for people whose trouble began with something they published, posted, organised or attended – the point at which expression turns into a criminal file.

The experience behind the offer

The work is delivered by our Executive Director, Festus Ogun, together with the lawyers on our team and the counsel we collaborate with, among them Senior Counsel Jacob Sule, Collins Okeke and Oghenefejiro Omoru. Between them, that team’s public interest litigation experience includes:

A right you cannot afford to enforce is a right you do not really have. Legal aid is the difference between the two.

Why this sits at the centre of the work

Almost every case above began the same way: someone said something, published something, or turned up somewhere, and the machinery of the state responded with an arrest rather than an argument. The charge sheet is the message, and the months before trial are the punishment, whatever the eventual verdict.

That is why we treat representation as inseparable from advocacy. Getting one person out of custody matters enormously to that person. Changing the provisions that put them there is what stops the next arrest, which is why our litigation, our policy work and our public education draw on the same body of cases.

This work runs through several of our focus areas, in particular Access to Justice & Reforms, Free Speech, Digital Rights & Freedom and Protest & Online Organizing.

Still open

The need has not receded. We are currently supporting the defence of Stanley Ugagbe, held at Kuje since July over three published reports, and we have called for the discontinuance of the prosecution of the influencer known as Justice Crack.

If you are a journalist, blogger, organiser or protester facing arrest or prosecution over something you published or attended, you can report a case to us.

You can read more about how this fits with the rest of what we do on our Our Work page.

More from FDJ

All news
Bail Is Not Vindication: Why the Charges Against “Justice Crack” Should Be Dropped
Opinion

Bail Is Not Vindication: Why the Charges Against “Justice Crack” Should Be Dropped

May 8, 2026
Read More →
What We Took Away From PrivCon 2026
Event

What We Took Away From PrivCon 2026

September 10, 2026
Read More →
16 Men Released After Weeks in Custody Over Alleged Shouting, Unlawful Assembly
News

16 Men Released After Weeks in Custody Over Alleged Shouting, Unlawful Assembly

October 17, 2026
Read More →
FDJ Secures Release of Detainee After Months at Kirikiri Correctional Centre
News

FDJ Secures Release of Detainee After Months at Kirikiri Correctional Centre

October 14, 2026
Read More →

Has your digital right been violated?

Tell us your story. Our legal team reviews every submission and will guide you on the path to justice.

Report a case
Protesters holding placards demanding accountability and good governance